This paper will study the reasons behind the decision of converting the Transportation Demand Forecast Model from TransCAD to the Cube software package. Despite the initial investments needed to convert or redevelop transportation model, the benefits do add up expeditiously. It may be even beneficial to convert the model to a new platform. When evaluating applications, one should consider factors such as ease of maintenance and output information along with runtime duration. The difference is not only a matter of computer time - as the run requires professional monitoring that, in turn, transfers directly to cost. Run time duration is one of the many factors transportation professionals should consider. However, one model application could take one tenth of the run time of the other. For example, when applying/using the same modeling approach on transportation demand forecasting, it can be expected that two different model applications provide comparable results. After all, the selection of which transportation software application to deploy the transportation demand model will greatly affect the outcome of the run. The key to develop an accurate, reusable, and representative transportation demand model requires extensive planning prior to beginning any coding. Transportation Planning: Travel Demand Modeling Forecast: Model Conversion from TransCAD to Cube Voyager
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |